Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

General Forum for Danville Topics

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby shawn_oneil » Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:50 pm

SBinRockrimmon wrote:
Sarcasm wrote:With Wanda's winning personalty and happy-go-lucky approach it's hard to believe everyone including the PD doesn't get along with her. I always thought she was a real people person. Image [/sarcasm]


I had a hard time typing this with a straight face.


Wow I haven't cried laughing like that in a long time.
Thanks Sbin!
Shawn
Shawn O'Neil


Image
The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money” –Margaret Thatcher
shawn_oneil
 
Posts: 2123
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:51 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 11:33 am

SBinRockrimmon and shawn_oneil both might not think that I have that "winning personality" and in their eyes "not a people person."

What have the two of you ever done for your community (without being paid or a profit of some sort) or for the less fortunate???

I on the other hand make Christmas happen for people who can not afford it. I not only buy, wrap and deliver the presents for entire families, I also supply a full turkey meal that has been cooked and desserts. For the past 10 years we have taken in foreign exchange students from just about every country (Germany, Russia, Thiland, Twain, Spain, France, China, just to name a few) totally supporting and entertaining these kids when they are in our country.

All of this being done with no monetary compensation what so ever. I may no provide anything to the Danville community and there are reasons for that, but I do plenty work within other communities.

So once again SBinRockrimmon and shawn_oneil without getting paid, what do you do for others outside of your lives???
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby curt » Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:13 pm

Very often people project different aspects of their personality online than in person.

The tone of your postings here is often nasty and negative. That is what people are responding to.
Curt Springer
curt
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:19 am
Location: 228 Sandown Road, North Danville

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:35 pm

So what are you saying Curt. Our police department harasses my family beyond belief, maliciously prosceutes me and I am just supossed to agree and put up with it and because I did not and have been vocal about it, I am perceived as someone who is "not a people person."

What about the town official who broke into my house two times when I was on vacation three years ago, I attempted to have trespassing charges charged but I guess that now takes away from my "winning personality" now doesn't it???

Personally I do not care what someone perceives me to be, I do know that the little boy in Uganda and another child in Zambia that I support and take care of each month think the world of me. The homes that I bring Christmas to each season can not get enough of my "winning personality."

The exchange students from Germany, Spain and Thiland that have come back just to visit, bringing their extended families back with them can not say enough about me.

Once agian what has SBinRockrimmon and shawn_oneil and any other person who finds it necessary to bad mouth me, what have you done for your community without some type of compensation.

Exchange students stay they entire school year and I always have at least two at a time, two extra teenagers to feed for the entire school year and house, entertain, etc is not cheap. How many meals has Shawm Oneil or SBinRockrimmon provided to someone who has nothing to eat or gifts to a child who does not have toys???

I am not Mother Theresa nor do I ntry and project myself to be, but just because I refuse to have anything to do with the Town of Danville does not mean that I do not do things for the local community
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby SBinRockrimmon » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:45 pm

Image

Wanda, you are not only a compulsive liar you don't do anything unless you stand to benefit from it. Given your history and my knowledge of you I have no reason to believe you help ANYONE without getting something in return. It's not in your nature. No matter what you post I still won't believe you. You are the child that cried wolf one too many times.
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. - Thomas Jefferson

To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. - Thomas Jefferson

Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. - Benjamin Franklin
SBinRockrimmon
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:34 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:56 pm

SBinRockrimmon you are right, I do benefit from all I do. I get the satisfaction of knowing that kids who have nothing are being fed, clothed, given an education, receives medical care, gifts, etc., excuse me for being selfish.
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby SBinRockrimmon » Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:04 am

Most people that do good things, don't need to pat themselves on the back and spend time convincing others that they do good things. I still say you don't do anything unless you can benefit from it in some way.

Look a wolf!!!!
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. - Thomas Jefferson

To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. - Thomas Jefferson

Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. - Benjamin Franklin
SBinRockrimmon
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:34 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:28 am

Do not change the subject SBinRockrimmon, face it you are a pathetic loser who only thinks nof yourself. If I really wanted to "pat myself on the back" as you stated then I would have bragged about hosting students for over 10 years now, doing Christmas for Kids for about 12 years or the two new children in Uganda and Zambia for a year now. I have been doing this all through my health issues including while I went through my organ transplant. Maybe since you never knew any of this about me before is because I do not have to go around patting myself on the back.

Now why don't you do something good for the community you live in rather than bashing others who do.
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby curt » Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:24 pm

I don't think a public forum such as this is a venue for determining if somebody is a good person or a bad person. I'm not sure that any place is appropriate for such a simplistic determination, including the scene at the pearly gates.

In various cases, neither Wanda nor the town has prevailed against the other side.

In this or any other case that arises, there is a presumption of innocence and whether somebody is liked or disliked should not come into consideration at all.

I have no reason at this point to believe that the Danville PD or Plaistow PD mishandled the case. I would be interested to know how this went from being a landlord-tenant dispute to a criminal case.
Curt Springer
curt
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:19 am
Location: 228 Sandown Road, North Danville

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:41 pm

1) Boyfriend / girlfriend looked at apartment, filled out rental application and was approved for tenancy
2) Boyfriend / girlfriend decided they needed the money for other things and wanted it back even though they had been approved 2 weeks prior and took posession of the apartment
3) Check was given for security deposit, tenant told the PD that they gave a check but did not sign it, they stated I signed their name on the check and then cashed the check.
4) They filed a police report with both Danville & Plaistow Police Departments, they decided to claim theft on my part with both the bank and PD. By claiming theft the bank gave them back their money
5) From this point on boyfriend / girlfriend duo refused to cooperate with the Prosecutor and PD, they had their money back and that is all that mattered to them
6) Case dismissed because of their refusal to cooperate

You are right Curt, if anything this should have been handled in civil court, both Danville and Plaistow Police made more of this whole thing then what it really was. Tenant signed a rental agreement and that signature was used to compare with the signature on the signed check with my attorney and the judge. Check had obviously been signed by the girlfriend and then when it came down to it they then refused to cooperate with the court because then that would have been perjury.
Last edited by momof3 on Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby curt » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:24 am

Actually, from what you write I do see grounds for a criminal case. They had a document with one signature and a check with a different one.

But it would seem to me that charges ought to be brought now against these people. I'm not going to take the time now to look up RSAs, but I think it would likely be a misdemeanor instead of a felony, something like "unsworn falsification."
Curt Springer
curt
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:19 am
Location: 228 Sandown Road, North Danville

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:46 pm

If the police had taken the time to properly investigate, the police should have come to question me, I would then have shown them the signed rental agreement which would have matched the signature on the check and should have been the end of issue.

Of course the signature on their complaint did not match the signature on the rental agreement or the check, at this point they made it look different.

Not sure how to go about getting the prosecutor or the police department to go after these people because as you said they filed false statements with both Danville and Plaistow. They also lied to TD BankNorth when they said the money had been stolen filing a false report and then the bank reimbursed them back their money.

Once they had their money back then they refused to cooperate from that point on. Curt, I am waiting for the dismissal report from the judge that specifically states that the case was dismissed due to their lack of cooperation.
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby curt » Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:07 am

Tenant signed a rental agreement and that signature was used to compare with the signature on the signed check with my attorney and the judge.


If the police had taken the time to properly investigate, the police should have come to question me, I would then have shown them the signed rental agreement which would have matched the signature on the check and should have been the end of issue.


I misunderstood the first quoted statement. I thought the police had compared the rental agreement and the check and that this was the basis of the criminal charge.

Is it that the account was only in the name of the man, not a joint account, and that the woman signed it using the man's name and not hers?
Curt Springer
curt
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:19 am
Location: 228 Sandown Road, North Danville

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby momof3 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:37 pm

Then you misunderstood, the police compared the signature on their drivers licenses to the one on the check and since those did not match the the PD jumped on the situation and automatically assumed fraud on the situation. Neither PD came to me to ask or see anything because the people lied to the police when they said they never filled out a rental agreement or lease with me. A rental agreement was in fact signed, thye people took possesion of the apartment and even went in and changed some of the carpets because they did not like the color. They then decided they coluld not move in due to financial issues. Lease specifically states that if you are approved for the apartment but then for any reason do not move in then you forfeit your security deposit for liquidated damages. It took me another month and a half to find other tenants, newspaper ads had to be run, interviews, checking of references, etc

Once again if the police had investigated this whole issue properly then I would have shown them the rental agreement and that signature did match the one on the check. Instead I had to pay an attorney $5000 dollars to represent me and hire a handwriting expert to testify at trial and a year of this BS which if anything should have gone to small claims court but you know our local police departments, they manifest everything that involves me.
momof3
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:19 pm

Re: Wanda Cote Indicted by Rockingham Cty Grand Jury

Postby curt » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:43 am

Off-topic link removed.
Last edited by curt on Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Curt Springer
curt
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 1:19 am
Location: 228 Sandown Road, North Danville

PreviousNext

Return to Danville General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron